View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
k_h_d
Joined: 11 Jul 2011 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 6:17 pm Post subject: Durelon pulp cap with surpass |
|
|
Today I had a patient in with recurrent decay under a very large occlusal composite on #18. Using rubber dam isolation the mesial pulp horn was exposed. Blood stopped almost immediately. I cleaned the cavity preparation with NaOCl and placed a base of durelon over the exposure and the visible ceiling of the pulp floor. After it set I then restored as normal with Surpass, thin layer of titan flowable co-cured with surpass. Then incremental buildup of composite (gradia direct X).
I called the patient this evening to see how she was doing. Overall no sensitivity to cold but she did say she had a sharp pain when chewing on the tooth. She has no pain when simply biting together. No cold sensitivity as of yet.
Was this the proper protocol for a pulp cap with durelon? My first thoughts while using this technique were that sensitivity would possibly be caused while biting with pressure being applied to the non bonded durelon. Will these biting symptoms subside?
Please let me know if this was correct protocol and these symptoms are normal.
Thanks,
Kenny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john kanca
Joined: 14 May 2005 Posts: 6346
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am a little concerned with the use of NaOCl as a cavity cleaner. My preference in this case would be use Consepsis to clean the cavity, then 3% NaOCl for hemostasis, followed by Durelon, Surpass and Titan.
Were there any symptoms at all prior to restoration? How long had the lesion been present? _________________ "You need me on that wall."
"You don't have a town named after you" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ilikecoffee
Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 123
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any thoughts on Viscostat clear for this use? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john kanca
Joined: 14 May 2005 Posts: 6346
|
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ilikecoffee wrote: | Any thoughts on Viscostat clear for this use? |
No no no. Hemostasis has to be very gentle so as not to coagulate blood within the pulp chamber. _________________ "You need me on that wall."
"You don't have a town named after you" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scottie
Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 360 Location: Albuquerque NM
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John, is part of that hemostasis being very gentle using 3% hypochlorite, in other words cutting the regular 6% bleach in half with water?
Also what do you think of using a glass ionomer over the durelon and then the bonding agent, flowable and comp? I hear so many good things about glass ionomers, how they chemically bond to tooth structure and release Fluoride etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
john kanca
Joined: 14 May 2005 Posts: 6346
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
scottie wrote: | John, is part of that hemostasis being very gentle using 3% hypochlorite, in other words cutting the regular 6% bleach in half with water?
Also what do you think of using a glass ionomer over the durelon and then the bonding agent, flowable and comp? I hear so many good things about glass ionomers, how they chemically bond to tooth structure and release Fluoride etc. |
Scottie, glass ionomers don't bond to the tooth any differently from zinc phosphate or carboxylate. It's all the same. You would not want fluoride being released into a pulp. Yet you can use GI over the Durelon but I do not find it necessary.
And yes, cut the bleach in half- to 3%. It provides a very gentle and superficial hemostasis, which is exactly what is desired. _________________ "You need me on that wall."
"You don't have a town named after you" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|